![]() In its more traditional usage, lama especially refers to one’s personal teacher, and by extension it therefore can also be used to refer to any Buddhist practitioner or teacher who is worthy of respect. As with the Sanskrit term, Lama is loosely defined, and historically, it is not a formal term or title that is conferred on a practitioner, although in more recent years the practice of bestowing lama as a title is not unheard of. Lama is the Tibetan translation of the Sanskrit guru (“teacher”). (In several Tibetan lineages, revered teachers do not necessarily hold formal monastic ordination, and they therefore may be married and have children.) An exception is the Sakya school’s lineage of married monk-teachers dating back to the 11th century. Tibetan monastics, as a rule, do not marry. Monastics-and less frequently, lay practitioners-also may choose to go on retreat and spend months or years in isolated hermitages or caves. Others, especially in places where there are no abbeys in their lineage, live among lay dharma practitioners, but in principle they are meant to return periodically to a monastery. Many move to monasteries or nunneries to study and practice as part of a sangha, or monastic community. I plan to update it to a newer version soon and that update should bring in a bunch of new word senses for many words (or more accurately, lemma).What’s the difference between a monk, a nun, a tulku, a rinpoche, and a lama?Ī Tibetan Buddhist who becomes a monk or nun leaves home and takes vows to lead a life of contemplation, meditation, renunciation, and simplicity. Special thanks to the contributors of the open-source code that was used in this project: the UBY project (mentioned above), and express.js.Ĭurrently, this is based on a version of wiktionary which is a few years old. I simply extracted the Wiktionary entries and threw them into this interface! So it took a little more work than expected, but I'm happy I kept at it after the first couple of blunders. The researchers have parsed the whole of Wiktionary and other sources, and compiled everything into a single unified resource. That's when I stumbled across the UBY project - an amazing project which needs more recognition. However, after a day's work wrangling it into a database I realised that there were far too many errors (especially with the part-of-speech tagging) for it to be viable for Word Type.įinally, I went back to Wiktionary - which I already knew about, but had been avoiding because it's not properly structured for parsing. This caused me to investigate the 1913 edition of Websters Dictionary - which is now in the public domain. I initially started with WordNet, but then realised that it was missing many types of words/lemma (determiners, pronouns, abbreviations, and many more). The dictionary is based on the amazing Wiktionary project by wikimedia. ![]() And since I already had a lot of the infrastructure in place from the other two sites, I figured it wouldn't be too much more work to get this up and running. I had an idea for a website that simply explains the word types of the words that you search for - just like a dictionary, but focussed on the part of speech of the words. ![]() Both of those projects are based around words, but have much grander goals. ![]() For those interested in a little info about this site: it's a side project that I developed while working on Describing Words and Related Words.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |